|
AFTER RAUL, ¿QUÉ?
By José Azel *
Cuba Transition Project
Institute for Cuban
and Cuban-American Studies
University of Miami
Miami
Florida
USA
La Nueva Cuba
March 19, 2007
The succession
from Fidel to Raul, programmed since the early days of the revolution,
is now an official fact. It was an efficient, effective and seamless
succession. The hallucination in which Raul Castro intervenes forcefully
to end the communist era and inaugurates a new democratic and market
oriented Cuba is not how the story ends. We need to rethink how
Cuban communism will come to an end.
Clearly, given
Rauls age and possible health problems there will be another
succession in the not to distant future. And this next succession
may not go as smoothly as the one from Fidel to Raul. Raul Castros
perfunctory successor, Jose Ramon Machado Ventura, is 77 years old
and not obligatorily seen as the next Cuban leader in the same way
that Fidel had anointed his younger brother as his successor. Perhaps
an interesting parallel can be made with the events in the Soviet
Union following Leonid Brezhnevs death in 1982. His successor
Yuri Andropov, who was 78 years old, died two years later. He was,
in turn, succeeded by the also elderly Constantin Chernenko who
died a year after and was succeeded by Mikhail Gorbachev.
Therefore,
from a longer-term strategic perspective, the critical questions
are not what economic reforms Raul may or may not introduce, but
rather what follows after Raul. The younger brother has been in
charge of the armed forces for nearly fifty years and has had the
opportunity, over all those years, to appoint his military officers
to any number of positions in government and industry. His most
recent appointments of Machado Ventura, Casas Regueiro and others
are illustrative. Accordingly, the most likely after Raul
scenario will have a strong military flavor and will include his
loyalists in the military and the communist party. Possible succession
scenarios, among others, are a more or less classical military dictatorship,
a triumvirate, or some other first among equals approach.
Yet, there may be a more sinister plot in the making.
Currently the
role of the Cuban military in the economy is extensive and pervasive
with the military managerial elite controlling, by some estimates,
over sixty percent of the economy. The breath and depth of this
military control of the countrys key economic sectors is astonishing.
GAESA, the holding company for the Cuban Defense Ministry, is involved
in all key sectors of the economy. Enterprises with innocuous sounding
names such as TRD Caribe S.A., Gaviota, S.A. and Aerogaviota are
all part of the vast economic involvement of Cubas Fuerzas
Armadas Revolucionarias (FAR). There is every reason to expect that
Raul Castro will continue to promote the involvement and monopolistic
control of his armed forces in the economy as he has since the late
1980s and the collapse of the Soviet Union.
If we postulate
that Raul Castro, as a matter of survival not ideology, is likely
to introduce some tentative economic reforms, we need to note the
corollary that he will simultaneously continue to expand the metamorphosis
of his officers into businessmen. Arguably this can be viewed as
a positive development where warriors turn in their weapons for
calculators. But we need to look into our crystal ball for what
happens next, when the Raul era comes to an end leaving FAR officers
in political control as well as in control of all key sectors of
the economy.
In a system
where enterprises are state owned and managed, the military officers
turned business executives enjoy the privileges of an elite ruling
class. Their standard of living is higher, they move into better
homes, and the like. But these benefits are miniscule when compared
with the opportunities to gain significant wealth via a position
of equity ownership in the enterprises under their managerial control.
It will not take long for the military elite to realize that managing
government owned enterprises, as they have done under Cuban communism,
offers only limited benefits - owning the enterprises is a far more
rewarding and lucrative option. In the first instance they may enjoy
some foreign travel and live in a nicer Havana home. In the second,
the travel would be by privately owned executive jets to second
homes in Paris or Madrid.
Once the Castro
brothers are no longer in the picture the military elite will be
highly motivated to lead the way towards a privatization of the
economy. Specifically the military officers will have every incentive
to champion a manipulated privatization of the industries under
their managerial control in order to monetize their managerial positions.
Alas, this illegitimate and corrupt mockery of a privatization process
will end up with the military managing team as the new ownership
team initially controlling the cash flows and eventually creating
the market conditions to monetize their equity position.
A liberalization
of the Cuban economy following its current militarization, if not
conducted in a transparent democratic environment, is likely to
make the military elite into instant millionaires as the new Cuban
captains of industry. In another possible parallel to
the Russian experience, only sixteen years after the collapse of
the Soviet Union, we learn that: Russia with 87 billionaires
is the new number two country behind the U.S., easily overtaking
Germany, with 59 billionaires
(1) Either Russian businessmen
posses the most extraordinary entrepreneurial skills in world history
or their ascendancy in wealth accumulation has a suspect origin.
In a supreme
ironic twist we could see a post-Fidel/Raul situation in which a
fraudulent privatization takes place leaving the likes of Gen. Julio
Casas Regueiro as the new majority shareholder of GAESA Enterprises
with Raul Castros son-in-law Col. Luis Alberto Lopez Callejas
as his CFO, Comandante Ramiro Valdez Menendez as the new CEO and
sole owner of the newly created Cuban Electronics Group, Gen. Ulises
Rosales del Toro as Board Chairman and controlling shareholder of
the new Cuban Sugar Enterprises, Marcos Portal León, another
of Raul Castros relatives, as president and COO of the lucrative
Cuba Nickel, S.A. and more.
By and large,
the politically exhausted and by now apathetic Cuban population
will not view these ownership changes as particularly undesirable
or nefarious. They may even view them as a positive transition towards
free markets and prosperity. The international community will also
acclaim the generals as agents of change bringing a market economy
to Cuba. Indeed, in this disheartening end game scenario Cuban communism
will have come to an end, leaving the generals and their heirs as
the nouveau riche devoid of a democratic culture.
It is often
argued that the introduction of economic reforms even in isolation
of political reforms will lead sequentially and inexorably to democracy.
Advocating for a China or Vietnamese transition model for Cuba,
the unilateral lifting of the U.S. embargo, etc. are all offered
as first steps on the eventual road to democracy. But decades after
the introduction of economic reforms we are witnessing a China that,
although certainly wealthier, is no less authoritarian.
I am afraid
that putative economic reforms conducted in a corrupt military controlled
environment without hand-in-hand political reforms will lead only
to a transfer of wealth from the state to the ruling military/party
elite. Even if we posit that democracy will ultimately follow an
economic opening, we need to heed the admonishment that, democracy
delayed is democracy denied. (2) Cubans deserve better.
Notes
(1) Luisa
Kroll, The
Worlds Billionaires 2008, Forbes.com, March 5, 2008.
(2) This
is a rewording of former British Prime Minister William E. Gladstones
famous Justice delayed is justice denied.
_______________________________________
* José
Azel is a senior research associate at the Institute for Cuban and
Cuban-American Studies, University of Miami. Dr. Azel was an adjunct
professor of international business at the School of Business Administration,
University of Miami. He holds undergraduate and masters degrees
in business administration and a Ph. D. in international affairs
from the University of Miami.
|