|
September 20, 2001
DIRECTORIO: NEWS HEADLINES
SPECIAL REPORT
CUBA AND THE TERROR COALITION:
The Emergence of the Terrorist International
by Orlando Gutierrez-Boronat
Center for the Study of a National Option
(with research support from Rafael Artigas and Ana Carbonell)
It was not hard to guess what common foe brought the Supreme Leader and the Comandante together for their summit
meeting in Tehran
in May of this year. The statements made by Fidel Castro during his visit to Iran are chilling when read in light of the
Sept. 11
terrorist attacks. According to news reports, during the visit Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei œassured Castro
that Iran and Cuba
can defeat the US hand in hand,? to which Castro agreed, adding that America was œextremely weak today,?
and that œwe are today
eye-witness to their weakness, as their close neighbors.? At Tehran University he stated to the thunderous
applause of students and
faculty that œThe imperialist king will finally fall,? (AFP, May 10th). Immediately afterwards the Iranian Press
Service proudly
proclaimed that œIran and Cuba reached the conclusion that together they can tear down the United States.?
(IPS, May 10th)
Some have argued that Cubas well-documented sponsorship and instigation of international terrorism is a thing of
the past, to be
understood in light of the Cold War context. However, irrefutable evidence indicates that to this day:
(a) The Castro dictatorship continues to actively harbor international terrorists,
(b) The Castro dictatorship continues to pursue a strategic alliance with terrorist states so as to create an
˜anti-Western
international front, and
(c) The Castro dictatorship has engaged directly in terrorist attacks and espionage against Americans.
As recently as July 1999 Domingo Muchaustegui, a former Cuban government official said to have exceptional
information about the
Cuban government, wrote: œFor U.S. interests, the closeness of the [Cuban] relationship with Iraq and some of the
more militant
terrorist groups in the Middle East is troublesome. Can Cuba be used to carry out terrorist acts against U.S. targets?
Is there any
cooperation between Sadam Hussein and Castro in the development of chemical and bacteriological weapons? What
remains from the close
cooperation between Castro and the more militant terrorist groups in the region?? (University of Miami Middle East
Studies
Institute, July 1999).
Evidence indicates that Cuba today continues to serve as a base for coordination and mutual support among
transnational terrorist
organizations. In August 2001 Colombian authorities arrested three suspected IRA terrorists who were providing
specialized training
to the FARC terrorist organization. One of the men, Nial Connolly, had lived in Cuba since 1996 as the IRAs
representative.(The
Times, August 16, 2001, BBC News August 17, 2001)
It is believed that it was in Cuba where the IRA established contact with both the FARC and ELN terrorist
organizations. These two
organizations, according to the State Departments 2000 report on global terrorism, have maintained a
permanent presence in the
island.? It is further believed that the IRA men were training the Colombian rebels in the development of powerful
anti-personnel
explosives destined for the proposed FARC ˜urban offensive.
The Castro regime has not only continued to provide support for the vicious Basque terrorist organization ETA, known
for its ghastly
car bomb attacks on civilian targets, but it has also publicly attempted to scuttle diplomatic efforts to condemn it. In a
1995 raid
by French police on ETA hideouts, computer files were found which clearly indicated that Cuban intelligence aided
members of the
group wanted for terror attacks in Spain. According to the files, Cubas Communist Party œconsiders its
relations with ETA to be
˜fraternal, sustained, strategic and increasingly deep. (The Miami Herald, Dec. 27, 1997)
Cuban covert support for terrorism in Spain has been accompanied by attempts at diplomatic protection. Castro not
only refused to
join the other Ibero-American heads of state in condemning ETA terrorism at the 2000 Ibero-American summit, he also
œslammed Mexico
for its support of a statement against terrorism at the Ibero American Summit in Panama.? (The Miami Herald, Nov.
11,2000).
The Cuban dictatorships continued relationship with bloody terror groups and the use of Cuban territory and
diplomacy to protect
them has long been a mainstay of Cuban foreign policy. As State Department reports indicate, Americans sought for
crimes linked to
60s radical groups have long received sanctuary in the island. What proves even more worrisome however, has
been the recent effort
by the Cuban regime to forge an ˜anti-Western front with terrorist states in the Middle Eastern region.
On September 18, 2000 in an exclusive interview with the Qatar-based Al-Jazeera television, Castro stated thatÂ
œWe are not ready
for reconciliation with the United States, and I will not reconcile with the imperialist system.? He further added that
his
government had successfully defended Cuba against a Western cultural invasion,? echoing one of the key
themes of fundamentalist
Islamic groups in the region. In May 2001 Castro undertook a round of visits to Syria, Libya, and Iran. Speaking at
Tehran
University, he insisted that people must be informed and awakened, they must not allow themselves to be
pillaged by the West.? On
July 26, 2001, Castro marked another anniversary of the beginning of his revolution by marching in Havana alongside
the Ayatollah
Khomeinis grandson, now a high ranking Iranian official.
The Iran-Cuba link has long worried intelligence and security analysts in the US. Soviet Colonel Ken Alibek, formerly
second-in-command of the USSRs bacteriological arms development program, has long insisted that the Castro
regime has such weapons
at its disposal. In his book Biohazard, Alibek quotes his former boss, General Yuri T. Kalinin, as having told him that
Cuba had an
active bacteriological arms program. Former Secretary of Defense William Cohen stated in May 1998 that:
œCubas current scientific
facilities could support an offensive biological warfare program in at least the research and development stage.? In
October 2000
Cuban vice president Carlos Lage and the Iranian vice minister of Health inaugurated a biotechnological research and
development
plant outside Tehran. Experts expressed doubts about the supposed medical objectives of the installation, since Iran
already
produces 97% of the medicines its population consumes.
It is feasible to both establish the links of the bin Laden network with the Iranian government and to identify its common
interests
with the Castro regime. Both Castro and bin Laden work hard to build a common front to bring down the United States
and to develop
biological weapons of mass destruction.
In its indictment of bin Laden the Justice Department stated that the Al-Qaeda terrorist organization under his
command sought to
put aside its differences with Shiite Muslim terrorist organizations, including Iran and its affiliated terrorist group
Hezbollah,
to cooperate against the perceived common enemy, the United States and its allies¦?
The indictment further alleges that Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in Sudan
and with
representatives of the government of Iran, and its associated terrorist group Hezballah.? In February 1998 Osama
bin Laden announced
the creation of an œinternational front? against the United States. According to a document obtained by the PBS
program ˜Frontline,
bin Laden œregards an anti-American alliance with Iran and China as something to be considered.?
But there may be more to the Castro-bin Laden connection than the Iran link. In a March 4, 2000 story the Associated
Press reported
that: œA young Afghan who trained this winter at a camp in mountainous Kunar province, in northeastern
Afghanistan, said he saw men
from Chechnya, Sudan, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Cuba and North Korea. The North Korean, he said, had brought chemical
weapons, which were
stored in caves and in the dozens of sunbaked mud-and-stone houses.?
The New York Times reported in September 1998 that advisers provided President Clinton with evidence that œbin
Laden is looking to
obtain weapons of mass destruction and chemical weapons to use against US installations.? Is it that far-fetched to
see that the
ideological affinity between Cuba and Al Qaeda and the allure of bin Ladens money for Castros cash-strapped
regime could easily
result in the worst of scenarios?
As America prepares to build a global coalition for a definitive assault on international terrorism it must come to grips
with the
fact that the enemy is a step ahead. Policy makers, legislators and analysts must not dismiss Cubas insistent
efforts aimed
precisely at building an anti-Western alliance, its continued support and encouragement for international terrorist
organizations,
or its latent capacity for biological warfare and its propensity to share it with other terrorist states directly linked to US
enemies.
Above all, Castros continued virulent rhetoric against the US and the Western world in general must not be
overlooked. It was not
too long ago that Americans were the direct targets of Castroite terrorist attacks. On February 24, 1996 two unarmed
US civilian
aircraft were shot out of the sky in plain daylight in international air space, murdering three US citizens and one
resident. A
group of Cuban spies in Florida were recently convicted of conspiring to murder US citizens, seeking to penetrate US
military
installations, spying on members of the US Congress and providing information on Miami International Airport.
Turning a blind eye to Castro on the eve of the ˜first war of the 21st century, would be tantamount to ignoring the
Nazi and
Fascist alliance with Japan the day after Pearl Harbor. The enemy is 90 miles south of Key West. And he does not
hide his hatred for
us.
|
|